Relief therapeutics « Terug naar discussie overzicht

Relief therapeutics Holding

9.103 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 452 453 454 455 456 » | Laatste
MisterBlues
0
Is de inhaler in staat de longcellen te bereiken? Gaat de inhaler het redden? Klopt onderstaande tekst?

The inhaler is already available for scientific use and produced in Switzerland. Just needs FDA approval.

7 hours ago
Absolutely correct. It could be even bigger than you suggest as I can see a situation where anyone that goes to the doctor with a cold or cough would be prescribed the inhaler as a precaution against Covid.
The cost of the inhaler is likely to be lower than the cost of the test and is likely to be beneficial to any respiratory tract infection.
In a sense FDA approval of the IV form of RFL 100 is a loss leader to establish our position for the mass-market to follow.
Hopefully, the trials for the inhaler can proceed quickly. I can see much less resistance to people that are not seriously ill participating in such a trial. If their condition deteriorates they have other options, whereas in a trial for a seriously ill patient they only have one possibility and having a 50-50 chance of receiving a placebo is not attractive.
MisterBlues
0
Uit te zoeken: eerdere markt autorisatie 2005?

I am sure that you are aware that RLF-100 = Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide ("V.I.P.") = Aviptadil has already existing marketing authorisations in the US, entire EU, Philippines, New Zealand and several other countries.

Here page 113 mentioning by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) Avaptadil for "acute lung injury":
www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/annual...

This is a very big point when it comes to authorisation for all countries where it is already permitted for any disease, because it means that 2 of the 3 elements namely the first two of: production process, safety and efficacy, have been already assessed and approved by these countries. Of course regulatory bodies will also look for the safety data of the trials such as the phase II/III of RLFTF, but they will focus on the efficacy. This will speed up enormously the regulatory and administrative things to be done, before one can actually place a drug in the market. This is also one of the reason why I bought this share, because it will be among the very first (if not the first) to bring a drug on the market that works. Cytodyn maybe first for mild and moderate (depending on the regulatory bodies), but these two companies will be ahead of all others. And even more important: their drugs work (different to remdesivir and other failures).

I heard this as well. In a study in Freiburg 2005 VIP was already tested. Do you know why VIP has not been used before. Its a bit strange that it has already existing market authorization, however not been used so far. Do you maybe know why?

[verwijderd]
0
Tjonge jonge, ik heb toch niet vaak al mijn AEX aandelen in het rood voor die dag.
Belegger 86
0
quote:

DeZwarteRidder schreef op 21 augustus 2020 12:24:

Het begin van het einde voor de Relief-hype is in zicht:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Mogelijk al eind dit jaar coronavaccin

Door Johan Wiering
Updated 10 min geleden
36 min geleden in FINANCIEEL

Een vaccin tegen het coronavirus kan er mogelijk al razendsnel zijn. Het Amerikaanse Pfizer en Duitse BioNTech verwachten hun coronavaccin begin oktober ter goedkeuring aan de Amerikaanse toezichthouder FDA aan te bieden. Daardoor zou het vaccin nog dit jaar op de markt kunnen komen.
Wat leesvoer voor je over vaccins.

www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/20...
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

MisterBlues schreef op 21 augustus 2020 14:16:

Is de inhaler in staat de longcellen te bereiken? Gaat de inhaler het redden? Klopt onderstaande tekst?

The inhaler is already available for scientific use and produced in Switzerland. Just needs FDA approval.

7 hours ago
Absolutely correct. It could be even bigger than you suggest as I can see a situation where anyone that goes to the doctor with a cold or cough would be prescribed the inhaler as a precaution against Covid.
The cost of the inhaler is likely to be lower than the cost of the test and is likely to be beneficial to any respiratory tract infection.
In a sense FDA approval of the IV form of RFL 100 is a loss leader to establish our position for the mass-market to follow.
Hopefully, the trials for the inhaler can proceed quickly. I can see much less resistance to people that are not seriously ill participating in such a trial. If their condition deteriorates they have other options, whereas in a trial for a seriously ill patient they only have one possibility and having a 50-50 chance of receiving a placebo is not attractive.

Heb je een link naar waar dat staat? Dit is volgens mij erg belangrijk want de inhaler is volgens mij erg belangrijk mbt het aantal mogelijke behandelingen.
[verwijderd]
0
Koers is vrij stabiel vooralsnog, rond de 0,54. Hopelijk duwt Amerika hem richting de 0,60
[verwijderd]
0
Aan het begin van de dag en na 15.30 uur heb je toch vrij grote bewegingen als er geen nieuws is.
MisterBlues
0
quote:

Kleintje66 schreef op 21 augustus 2020 15:19:

[...]
Heb je een link naar waar dat staat? Dit is volgens mij erg belangrijk want de inhaler is volgens mij erg belangrijk mbt het aantal mogelijke behandelingen.
Die inhaler is al ontwikkeld in verband met Sarcoidosis.

Dit is wat ik vond na een zoekopdracht via Google:

www.bachem.com/fileadmin/user_upload/...

erj.ersjournals.com/content/32/5/1289
MisterBlues
0
quote:

MisterBlues schreef op 21 augustus 2020 14:19:

Uit te zoeken: eerdere markt autorisatie 2005?

I am sure that you are aware that RLF-100 = Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide ("V.I.P.") = Aviptadil has already existing marketing authorisations in the US, entire EU, Philippines, New Zealand and several other countries.

Here page 113 mentioning by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) Avaptadil for "acute lung injury":
www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/annual...

This is a very big point when it comes to authorisation for all countries where it is already permitted for any disease, because it means that 2 of the 3 elements namely the first two of: production process, safety and efficacy, have been already assessed and approved by these countries. Of course regulatory bodies will also look for the safety data of the trials such as the phase II/III of RLFTF, but they will focus on the efficacy. This will speed up enormously the regulatory and administrative things to be done, before one can actually place a drug in the market. This is also one of the reason why I bought this share, because it will be among the very first (if not the first) to bring a drug on the market that works. Cytodyn maybe first for mild and moderate (depending on the regulatory bodies), but these two companies will be ahead of all others. And even more important: their drugs work (different to remdesivir and other failures).

I heard this as well. In a study in Freiburg 2005 VIP was already tested. Do you know why VIP has not been used before. Its a bit strange that it has already existing market authorization, however not been used so far. Do you maybe know why?


Deze is ook belangrijk. Ga ik in het weekend doen.

Ik hoop dat iedereen het een en ander uitzoekt. Fijn weekend!
Hangyodon
0
brandweer man heeft iets meer inflammation gekregen en moet nu lasix gebruiken. vent 60 ecmo 100
[verwijderd]
0
In Amerika netjes gesloten op $ 0,59, hopelijk dit weekend of komende week meer nieuws en stijgen richting $ 1!
Hangyodon
0
Brandweerman gaat niet zo goed volgens mij. Xray geen verschil met afgelopen 2 dagen (dus niet slechter geworden) maar bloed druk omlaag, als deze weer laag word na medicijn. Moet hij stoppen met rlf100
Hangyodon
0
Ik dacht dat ze deze week met nieuws zou komen maar niet dus. Of was door die gestolen data uitgesteld?
[verwijderd]
0
www.upi.com/Health_News/2020/08/21/St...

"Aug. 21 (UPI) -- Remdesivir does not improve clinical outcomes in people hospitalized with moderate pneumonia from COVID-19, a study published Friday by JAMA Network Open found."
Belegger 86
0
quote:

Hangyodon schreef op 22 augustus 2020 08:23:

Brandweerman gaat niet zo goed volgens mij. Xray geen verschil met afgelopen 2 dagen (dus niet slechter geworden) maar bloed druk omlaag, als deze weer laag word na medicijn. Moet hij stoppen met rlf100
Het ligt er allemaal iets te dik op met die brandweerman, leuk dat het gevolgd wordt maar is verder geen officieel onderzoek of iets dergelijks.
Hier kunnen partijen gebruik van gaan maken om beweging in de koers te krijgen op basis van wat er over hem gepost wordt.

Belegger 86
0
quote:

Kleintje66 schreef op 22 augustus 2020 11:11:

www.upi.com/Health_News/2020/08/21/St...

"Aug. 21 (UPI) -- Remdesivir does not improve clinical outcomes in people hospitalized with moderate pneumonia from COVID-19, a study published Friday by JAMA Network Open found."

Dit artikel geeft eigenlijk aan wat iedereen al dacht over Remdesvir, als RLF 100 een stuk betere cijfers kan overleggen kan het hierdoor nog succesvoller worden en Remdesvir naar de achtergrond drukken.
9.103 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 452 453 454 455 456 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 15 apr 2024 17:31
Koers 1,250
Verschil -0,010 (-0,79%)
Hoog 1,250
Laag 1,210
Volume 3.456
Volume gemiddeld 15.182
Volume gisteren 9.973

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront