Bitcoin en andere cryptocurrencies « Terug naar discussie overzicht

Nieuw Bitcoin Forum

15.675 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 780 781 782 783 784 » | Laatste
DeZwarteRidder
0
deel 2:

If UBS wants to replicate the blockchain approach, but have a separate system to inject fresh cash into the system, then there must be an outside mechanism (not part of the blockchain itself) for doing so. Presumably, there will be some kind of "digital stamp" that validates a money supply increase of the system. The problem is that how do you know whether this digital stamp is on the run or not? Just the rumor that the digital stamp is on the run will collapse the system.

Some say that the centralized DNS system (the internet system to map domain names to IP addresses) has been running just fine even though it has this intrinsic single point of failure. But there's an immensely important difference between DNS and a financial system with a controlled money supply. One is money (as long as there's money there'll be scammers/robbers, no matter what regulation is put in place), the other is the scale. Here we need thousands of banks being able to inject fresh cash into the system (so they can clear their balance sheets whenever a customer wants a new loan), and thousands are orders of magnitude greater than the number of people involved to protect the central DNS system. But, says someone, this is how the current system works today, yes, but the current system doesn't have a public ledger which is precisely why transactions are so cheap in the bitcoin ecosystem. What I'm saying is that the blockchain approach is inherently incompatible with a human controlled money supply.

Therefore, there's no hope for a private institution, or a government controlled one, to build a blockchain approach to compete with Bitcoin. Such an approach has the intrinsic single point of failure which sooner or later will collapse the system. Bitcoin works because it is ingeniously designed so that there's never a single point of failure. My suggestion to the banks is to instead of inventing some crappy system themselves, is to embrace Bitcoin and start using it.

Internet is a free public network where everybody can participate. No one is foolish enough to try to build their own network and try to out-compete Internet. So my advice to our banks is to not try to fight Internet, sorry, Bitcoin, and start using it. Bitcoin will be the superior payment system and currency on this planet whether you like it or not. The sooner you jump on board this ship, the more power you'll get. The longer you wait the less power you'll get in this new world order. Are you onboard yet? I am.

Datavetaren

www.datavetaren.se/?p=why_banks_canno...
voda
0
Huis in Rotterdam te koop voor 877,5 aan bitcoins

Precies 877,5 aan bitcoins, dat vinden Errol en Ellen Rijssen hun loft aan de 's-Gravendijkwal in Rotterdam-West waard. De woning staat sinds gisteren te koop voor dit bedrag in virtuele munten. In 'gewoon' geld moet het huis 314.500 euro opleveren.
'We hebben zelf een digitale bitcoinportefeuille en dat bevalt goed', verklaart Errol Rijssen. 'We doen er weleens kleine betalingen mee, maar je kunt er natuurlijk ook een huis van kopen. Het is weer eens wat anders dan je huis onder de aandacht te brengen met versgebakken appeltaart.'

Het echtpaar Rijssen is niet uniek: vorig jaar was Capellenaar Ben Verloop de eerste Nederlander die zijn woning te koop zette in bitcoins. Drie maanden later stopte hij daarmee omdat hij geen respons kreeg.

De bitcoin werd in 2008 geïntroduceerd door de Amerikaanse Japanner Satoshi Nakamoto.

www.ad.nl/ad/nl/5597/Economie/article...
DeZwarteRidder
0
In IJsland is de Auroracoin grandioos mislukt wegens een foutieve opzet en het niet luisteren naar de mensen die verstand hebben van Bitcoin:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sr. Member
****
Activity: 364

Quark; Multi - Polar Crypto - For People
View Profile
Ignore

Re: Auroracoin - Forked and Game Over
Today at 05:46:41 AM

#301------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: MegaHertz on March 29, 2014, 05:48:23 PM
Here is the thing, Icelanders have really gotten hit by the 2008 crash. People lost homes and have seen mortgages go UP and principal down (in effect, because mortgages are tied to inflation) and have had some reality biting them in the ass.
But it wasnt their fault, it was the banking system and some bankers that let them down.
That is why there was a 50% pre-mine. To give the coins to Icelanders. Just because they didnt know about protecting block-chains, this was a poor excuse (if true) for a hacker to try to mess up a valid idea, a grand experiment, to try to offer some help to fellow Icelanders.

-MegaHertz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, instead of promoting bitcoin, the very first and strongest cryptocurrency that is intended to spread financial freedom around the world, someone is trying to push a utopian commie-coin 50% of which was pre-mined.
Instead of supporting international approach, they want to earn points with nationalism based currency. Good luck with that.

I really feel for those naive Icelanders who invested in this pseudo-national coin, that ended up as yet another pump and dump scheme.

While i rightly believe that this was the designers own fault by not understanding the political environment in which monopoly capitalists work , and in that sense this is a normal aspect of the market.

But what i can say is you are pushing shit up a hill a cocksucker like you that wants to promote Bitcoin as a tool of freedom , Bitcoin is a great design for the protocol that was Co opted by USD bagholders of which such useful idiot like Jesus wierdos etc are frequent.

All you are doing is speeding up the evolution, Bitcoin is old and centralized, we can see all the propaganda mouth piece's coming out supporting it, how long do you think it will all last ?

You think simple Joe public is going to buy that? If you do your more stupid than you sound .

All you are doing is providing better opportunity, so to that degree this is a positive, however Bitcoin is still old slow and above all centralized, with CNN and the like on the long road to full Communist style propaganda status with about 5 people tuning in how does one manage to spam this turd off to the guy on the street lol.

Again don't take this the wrong way , i think this is a positive as these fools might learn and this speeds up the process, i offered help at the beginning for AUR , none of this hurt me i have no interest in it.

Now hopefully someone will create it correctly lol.

bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54633...
DeZwarteRidder
0
zo 30 mrt 2014, 13:45
'Topman Bitcoin gebruikte heimelijk geld van klanten'
AMSTERDAM -

De topman van bitcoinplatform Mt. Gox gebruikte geld van klanten om om zijn bedrijf overeind te houden. Dat melden aan anonieme medewerkers aan persbureau Reuters.

Ceo Mark Karpeles is twee jaar geleden al eens aan de tand gevoeld door zijn medewerkers over de financiële situatie van zijn bedrijf. Er was sprake van groeiende onrust toen Mt. Gox in 2012 een groeispurt doormaakte.

Karpeles zou volgens de medewerkers geld van klanten hebben gebruikt om onder meer de huur te betalen. Ook kocht hij gadgets zoals een robot, een 3d-printer en een opgevoerde Honda Civic, aldus Reuters. Karpeles ontkende destijds ten overstaan van zijn personeel dat hij geld van klanten had gebruikt.

Mt. Gox was tot voor kort de grootste bitcoinbeurs. Maar het platform moest op 28 februari een faillissement aanvragen en wordt momenteel onderzocht door Japanse autoriteiten. Mt. Gox verloor 650.000 bitcoins (een slordige 240 mijoen euro) en 27 miljoen dollar. Mt. Gox claimt dat de bitcoins zijn gestolen nadat het beurs is gehackt.

www.telegraaf.nl/dft/22446125/___Topm...
DeZwarteRidder
0
De koers van de BTC is flink aan het dalen, volgens mij komt dat door de Chinese geruchten (die nog steeds niet zijn bevestigd) en kan de koers extra hard gaan dalen als er een officieel bericht uitkomt.

Ik vind het prima, want dan kan ik lekker goedkoop wat BTC kopen op een veel reëeler prijsnivo dan voor de Chinese BTC-hausse.

De enorme stijging dankzij de Chinezen, heeft overigens wel gezorgd voor een onbetaalbare reclame voor de BTC en voor een grote stijging van het aantal gebruikers.
DeZwarteRidder
0

Bitcoin trading accounts banned in China: report

Staff Reporter
2014-03-29
17:22 (GMT+8)
The People's Bank of China, the nation's central bank, has ordered banks and third-party payment companies to close all bitcoin trading accounts at more than 15 exchanges across the country, Shanghai-based China Business News reports.

The bank had recently issued a notice prohibiting domestic banks and third-party payment institutions from allowing bitcoin transactions, a source told the newspaper.

Accounts must be shut down by April 15, preventing investors in the currency from transferring funds, according to the source.

The measure was proposed during a meeting convened recently by the central bank to discuss ways to strengthen the prevention of risks involved in the peer-to-peer internet currency.

However, some industry insiders cast doubt on the feasibility of implementing such a ban.

Du Jun, co-founder of Huobi, China's busiest bitcoin exchange, told the newspaper that if companies' bank accounts were closed, then all records of transactions would go underground, which would make supervision more difficult.

Some industry insiders were of the view that some bitcoin exchanges had not received the notice yet.

"Our website runs normally and we have not yet received any notice," said Xu Mingxing, founding CEO of OKCoin, a bitcoin trading website.

The restrictions on the unregulated currency were the latest from the central bank, which has sought to limit dealings that might be used to launder money or evade capital controls. The central bank had issued a notice on Dec. 5, 2013 barring financial institutions and companies from receiving payments denominated in bitcoin, or making transactions with the currency or associated products.

The ban is a result of concerns that the digital currency might pose risks to China's capital controls and financial stability after a surge in trading in 2013 made the country the world's biggest trader of bitcoin, according to the paper.

The latest news had sent bitcoin prices down by nearly 10% to 3,300 yuan (US$532) as of March 27.
DeZwarteRidder
0
Official From PBOC Voices Bitcoin Doubts on Social Media
Eric Calouro | March 31, 2014 | 0 Comments

An official from the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) took to social media to voice his doubts and skepticism about bitcoin, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

The official, Zhang Niannian, posted on Sina Weibo on Friday, comparing bitcoin exchanges to casinos and asking questions like “Aren’t you afraid that a bitcoin platform will leave with your money?” and “Do you think the court would protect you?”

Niannian’s comments come in the midst of a rumor swirl in which Chinese media is reporting that the People’s Bank of China will be barring banks and third-party payment processors from dealing with bitcoin exchanges.

Despite this news not yet being confirmed by PBOC, nor any of the major exchanges reportedly subject to the ban, investors in the bitcoin community have reacted swiftly by panic selling.

As a result, the price dipped to about $500 per bitcoin, driving down to below $450 this weekend.

And while Niannian makes no mention of the rumors, he had some advice for the folks looking to get involved with or may already be involved with bitcoin:

“Cherish life, walk away from bitcoin,” he said.

Zhang Niannian dubs himself as a “manager” at the People’s Bank in China, though it’s not entirely clear what his duties entail. In a December 2013 press statement from the PBOC, he was the only name listed as a media contact.

What do you make of Mr. Zhang’s advice to walk away from bitcoin?
DeZwarteRidder
0
Interview: Bitcoin Foundation board member Elizabeth T. Ploshay
Elizabeth T. Ploshay has had a busy six months.

Since her election to the Bitcoin Foundation’s board in late-September 2013, she has volunteered her time to help that organization set up global affiliates, continued her work as manager of communications at Bitcoin Magazine, and helped organize the upcoming Bitcoin in the Beltway conference in Washington, DC.

We spoke with Ploshay about the work she is doing on many fronts.

CoinTelegraph: Could you tell us what you plan to speak about at Bitcoin in the Beltway?

Elizabeth T. Ploshay: I look forward to serving as co-chair of the Bitcoin in the Beltway Conference from June 20-22 in Washington, DC. While conference planning is still under way, I see that some of the key themes that will be addressed are Bitcoin prompting global financial inclusion, Bitcoin as a catalyst for charitable giving, Bitcoin and liberty, and of course, some of the technical developments in the Bitcoin space. I hope to provide an update from the Bitcoin Foundation and additionally stress the need for more women to get involved in the Bitcoin space.

You should all check out the conference and attend. You can find more information here.

CT: Your website says you only got into Bitcoin in January of last year. Could you tell us about how you first got interested in the currency?

EP: I will be forever grateful to my friend who opened up my eyes to the Bitcoin currency. While I was working on Capitol Hill for a congressman, I started to see firsthand how many uphill battles there are within the current system in the US. My boss was and still is a phenomenal man with integrity who is truly working for the betterment of his constituents. However, after I learned about Bitcoin, it became clearer to me that one can almost be more effective outside of the system with a technology like Bitcoin. Bitcoin alleviates the middle-man effect, works around red tape and additionally meets the financial and liberty needs of individuals on a global level.

I had an opportunity to work with Bitcoin Magazine, and that was the best decision I have made! I am so thankful that I now get to work for an industry that has proven to provide so much potential to truly help individuals around the world and is not dependent on a single point of failure.

It was the sharp contrast between the potential of Bitcoin compared to that of the broken system I was working in that made me take the final leap to get involved in promoting Bitcoin full time.

cointelegraph.com/post/interview_bitc...
DeZwarteRidder
0
wo 02 apr 2014, 13:30
’Toezichthouder China gaat regelgeving bitcoin aanscherpen’
door onze financiele redactie

Terwijl de aanhangers van Bitcoin voorzichtig de wonden likken na het recente ineenstorting van het Japanse handelsplatform Mt. Gox, bekijkt de Chinese centrale bank naar het invoeren van nieuwe voorwaarden om de digitale munt nog verder aan banden te leggen.

Er zou onder meer worden overwogen om bankrekeningen bij Chinese banken die transacties doen met bitcoins te laten sluiten, meldt The Financial Times op basis van ingewijdenen.

Met deze ban zou de digitale munt die op grote schaal omarmd wordt door individuen in China, het laatste belangrijke kanaal verliezen om de bitcoin te verhandelen in het Aziatische land.

Eind vorig jaar werd financiële instellingen in China al verboden om transacties in de virtuele munt af te handelen.
DeZwarteRidder
0
Eindelijk de bevestiging...!!
-----------------------------
China clamps down on bitcoin

Dow Jones newswires
April 02, 2014 1:30AM

China's central bank has ordered the country's commercial banks and payment companies to close bitcoin trading accounts in two weeks, according to people with knowledge of the matter, dealing another blow to the virtual currency.

Bitcoin prices are down roughly 8 per cent since the new rules were first reported in financial publication Caixin last week. The rules affect more than a dozen bitcoin exchanges, and are a further tightening of regulations the central bank put in place last year. The accounts must be shut down by April 15, the people said.

Authorities have kept an eye on bitcoin's expansion here as it poses a potential threat to financial stability and because it has attracted swarms of speculative retail investors looking for ways to make quick profits. China imposes strict capital and currency controls, but bitcoin, in theory, offers its holders a way to bypass those rules.

Chinese demand for bitcoin soared late last year, contributing to a rise in global prices and attracting the attention of regulators.

Regulators are also concerned about the safety of bitcoin exchanges following the collapse of Japan's Mt Gox exchange after most of the bitcoins it was holding were stolen.

The latest move by the People's Bank of China is a huge blow to the country's bitcoin exchanges, which have found their footing in the more than three months since Chinese authorities appeared to take measures clamping down on the industry. In December, the PBOC ordered financial institutions to stop dealing with bitcoin. Later that month, it made clear that third-party payment processors could not help exchanges collect money from users.

The earlier moves left Chinese bitcoin exchanges with the ability to take direct deposits into corporate bank accounts. In the subsequent months, trading volumes and prices rebounded, as investor confidence returned, in part due to relief that the government had not ruled out bitcoin completely. Some in the bitcoin community said it was actually a positive that the government had said people are free to buy bitcoin.

Making it clear that domestic banks cannot provide clearing, account opening and other services for bitcoin exchanges, however, leaves exchanges with significantly less room to maneuver.

"There will definitely be a negative impact to the exchanges," said Bobby Lee, chief executive of Shanghai-based BTC China, the most prominent Chinese exchange name abroad, having risen to briefly be the global leader by trading volume late last year. The latest move is a "stricter interpretation of the written rules" from the December statement, he added.

The exchange, he said, thought the December statement was "pretty relaxed" by comparison.

One of the people familiar with the latest directive said that the central bank does not intend to ban bitcoin trading in China, and said the move is to "enforce what was already said in the December document." That document had said bitcoin is not a currency with "real meaning" and does not have the same legal status as a currency, but that the public is free to buy and sell bitcoin online provided that they accept the risk.

BTC China and two other major bitcoin exchanges in China -- OKCoin and Huobi -- have all said they haven't gotten any official notice of a change from the central bank nor the banks that they have accounts with. A spokesman with BTC China said that the firm is trying to get clarity from the banks.

The three exchanges also said they haven't seen significant changes to their deposits yet, and that trading volumes have jumped in the last week due to bitcoin price volatility from the news.

OKCoin CEO Xu Mingxing said that if Chinese exchanges can't accept money into corporate accounts, they would likely have to incorporate themselves abroad and also move their servers overseas. BTC China's Mr Lee said one option would be for customers to use cash to make deposits directly with BTC China.

It "comes down to how it's going to be enforced...we're going to try different things," said Mr Lee.

Left on their own, bitcoin exchanges have thrived in China, given strong local demand in a country that doesn't offer many investment outlets. Exchanges here also don't need special licenses to operate, compared with other parts of the world, such as the US, where exchanges need licenses as money-transfer businesses.

Shanghai bitcoin consultancy Kapronasia estimates that there are roughly two dozen exchanges operating in China looking to benefit from strong local demand in a country with tight currency and capital controls.
DeZwarteRidder
0
The three possible outcomes of Bitcoin's future
BY DAVID SEAMAN

Recently the IRS put an unwelcome (maybe) burden in Bitcoin's wallet. As CNN Money reported, "The United States' new Bitcoin tax rules just made casual, everyday use a complicated bookkeeping headache. The Internal Revenue Service's notice last week will force the average Bitcoin user to keep a strict record of every purchase made all year long—then perform difficult calculations to account for the changing value of a bitcoin."

Since then, rumors have been swirling in China that their central banking authorities will soon issue--or already have issued, I suppose is the rumor—some kind of outright ban on Bitcoin usage.

Then there's Russia, which between its newfound regressive anti-gay stances and nation annexing adventures hasn't found much time to scaremonger its population in regard to cryptocurrency use, but they still aren't fond of it. So that makes three out of three superpowers where Bitcoin may be outstaying its welcome. The price of Bitcoin has taken a critical dive below $500 per coin in the wake of the IRS and China news. With the souring moods of corrupt Orwellian superpowers and fresh competition from a slew of competing new cryptocurrencies, where does this leave Bitcoin? I believe one of these three outcomes may occur:

1) The eventual collapse or death of the Bitcoin economy.
As consumer adoption fails to kick into higher gear, mainly due to the burdensome IRS requirements, venture capital firms lose interest in funding the next great Bitcoin business, merchants lose interest in accepting Bitcoin on their sites and in their stores, the media thus loses interest in covering it, and there you go, Bitcoin is dead.

Or somewhere along the same lines as Magic: The Gathering. Not quite dead, but definitely not mainstream.

2) Truly meteoric growth as more users begin to adopt it.
Some already believe the IRS requirements can easily be satisfied with attentive reporting software, and others believe the IRS classification is a blessing in disguise: if the government's highest tax authority believes Bitcoin is simple property (like a bookcase, TV, or arcade token), it does away with any pretext for other agencies to regulate Bitcoin as one would a state-issued foreign currency. This is potentially huge. The business side regulatory requirements for trading and exchanging foreign currencies are considerable, but not so for trading/exchanging bookcases, TVs, or—as the case may be—Bitcoins.

With the big regulatory and taxation questions now out of the way, consumers in the US could soon find Bitcoin's efficiency and nearly free cost structure just too tempting to resist. And businesses could find their transaction cost savings to be significant enough to integrate Bitcoin into every area of their business. If Bitcoin takes off, it could happen very quickly—especially in this era of social media. If everyone realizes Bitcoin makes plastic obsolete, it becomes reality.

3) Bitcoin explodes into a thousand pieces and something truly amazing emerges.
We are already seeing the earliest signs of this one, actually.
Litecoin, Dogecoin, Auroracoin, Quark—over a hundred and fifty new alternative cryptocurrencies, called "alt coins," have launched since Bitcoin itself. Some are short-lived novelties and near clones of Bitcoin, others are marketing driven, and yet others test out refinements and improvements of Bitcoin's original ideas.

One of my favorites is Vertcoin because its algorithm and community are focused heavily around something called "ASIC resistance." ASICs are specially designed chips that mine far faster than store-bought GPUs (graphics cards) or CPUs (the main chip on a consumer-grade laptop or desktop), and by "resisting" the development of new ASIC sets, it is believed the mining network can be kept more decentralized over time—keeping the coin and its public ledger in the hands of more individuals, rather than server farms.

Other coins, such as Dogecoin, carve out a niche primarily by offering great community—a fun, carefree environment where tipping and economic experimentation are wildly encouraged. Reddit CEO Yishan Wong recently had good things to say about this coin, precisely because its lighthearted culture is the antithesis of the super serious libertarian intellectual stereotype that has come to dominate Bitcoin lately. (Although if treating your coin as an investment, super serious intellectuals might be just what is needed!)

One way or another, I don't see digital currency going away. Yesterday I bought some gigs on Fiverr, and since I was logged into my Coinbase account, paying with Bitcoin was literally a one click process. Seeing as the one click checkout has been the fabled dream of e-commerce for years, and seeing as I wouldn't have made these impulse buys if I'd had to enter in a credit card number, this is very cool tech.

David Seaman is a journalist and host of the David Seaman Hour, available free on iTunes Podcasts and Stitcher. This article was originally featured on Medium and republished with permission.

www.dailydot.com/opinion/three-possib...
DeZwarteRidder
0
Chinese Bitcoin Exchanges OKCoin, BTC38 and FXBTC React to Central Bank Policy Changes
Eric Calouro | April 2, 2014 | 0 Comments

New reports indicate that Chinese bitcoin exchange OKCoin and FXBTC have been contacted by financial partners recording the closure of certain accounts used to conduct business.

OKCoin was reportedly contacted by a third-party payment processor, whilst FXBTC was contacts by commercial bank account providers, according to CoinDesk.

OKCoin confirmed this news with an official statement, noting that deposits via pre-paid cards will be halted. CoinDesk notes that debit card and yuan withdrawals are not affected.

FXBTC also posted an official statement noting that banking partners are looking to close accounts in use by the exchange. Debit card deposits will be stopped on April 3rd, and withdrawals will be halted temporarily following Sunday the 6th.

BTC38 has announced it will suspend fiat-to-crypto trading in the wake of all of this, as well.

The news follows rumors that the People’s Bank of China want all third-party payment processors and banks to sever ties with bitcoin exchanges, and while the PBOC hasn’t publicly issued any statements on the matter, that hasn’t stopped investors from selling.

At this time, the price of bitcoin is down nearly ten percent to $440 at the Bitstamp exchange.
DeZwarteRidder
0
Bank of Montreal Chief: Open to Embracing Bitcoin, Provided It’s Regulated
Eric Calouro | April 2, 2014 | 0 Comments

Bill Downe, CEO of the Bank of Montreal, made some interesting comments with regard to bitcoin at the bank’s annual meeting that took place on Tuesday in Toronto.

According to the Financial Post, Mr. Down said that if bitcoin was both reliable and regulated, “then there’s no reason why we couldn’t be an intermediary in bitcoin-related transactions.”

“Because, if you wanted a Swiss franc transaction or a Japanese yen transaction or a U.S. dollar transaction, we can do that transaction for you,” he was quoted as saying. “If bitcoin [can be] a reliable medium of exchange, then at that point in the future, we would be able to [conduct business] with bitcoin.” (quote from Financial Post)

It’s not every day you hear the Chief Executive of a major bank acknowledge the potential of bitcoin. More often, it seems as if they tend to be dismissive. Why? It’s a niche interest, and could also pose a threat to the traditional financial sector if it continues growing (among other things).

Other financial institutions have taken another avenue, bashing bitcoin (we’re looking at you, Goldman Sachs).

Read the full story at the Financial Post.
voda
0
De gulden is terug, nu als virtuele munt

Nederland heeft sinds deze week een eigen digitale cryptovaluta: de E-Gulden. Volgens de bedenkers van de virtuele munteenheid, een groep studenten, komen er maximaal 21 miljoen E-Guldens in omloop waarvan de helft wordt weggegeven aan Nederlanders.

© e-gulden.com.
De andere helft kan worden 'gemined' met een computer. Dat houdt simpel gezegd in dat de computer het geld genereert door berekeningen te maken. De E-Gulden is al op 30 maart in stilte gelanceerd, maar nu pas officieel geïntroduceerd omdat het inmiddels wordt geaccepteerd op verschillende markten.

Bitcoin
De E-Gulden is net als bekendere cryptovaluta als Bitcoin en Dogecoin een virtuele munteenheid die niet door de overheid of door banken wordt beheerd. De introductie van de Nederlandse 'digivaluta' is begeleid en wordt ondersteund door Mr. Mark Teurlings van Teurlings en Ellens Advocaten.

Iedere Nederlander die aan de slag wil met E-Guldens kan op e-gulden.com een eigen virtuele portemonnee aanmaken. In die 'spaarpot' worden dan ook meteen, gratis, 50 E-Guldens gestopt. Volgens de bedenkers van het systeem om het vertrouwen in de E-Gulden te versterken.

Overigens komt de gulden vermoedelijk niet alleen terug als E-Gulden. In Amsterdam schijnt hard gewerkt te worden aan een andere virtuele munt die refereert aan de oude gulden: de Guldencoin.

www.ad.nl/ad/nl/5597/Economie/article...
DeZwarteRidder
0
Bitcoin to $1 million? Why it could happen
CNBC.com staff | @CNBC
Thursday, 3 Apr 2014 | 1:06 PM ET
CNBC.com

At a time when bitcoin prices are falling sharply, at least one cryptocurrency advocate thinks the long-term direction is up—way up.

Wences Casares, CEO of bitcoin start-up Xapo, told The Wall Street Journal he thinks one bitcoin will be worth between $500,000 and $1 million in one decade.

The online currency, which is created by "miners" who solve complex math puzzles and can be traded on a number of exchanges, has seen its price fall sharply through the year amid a number of scandals and bankruptcies.

Since early March, bitcoin has lost a third of its value, most recently on the heels of a reported crackdown by the People's Bank of China.

Casares, though, believes the downturn will be short-lived as the virtual currency gains attraction in areas with unstable monetary situations.

"It's probably the easiest way for someone in a country where they cannot trust their currency or they cannot trust their bank to keep the fruits of their labor," he told the Journal in a video interview.

Read the full report and see the interview here.

www.cnbc.com/id/101552753
DeZwarteRidder
0
Could Bitcoin Become The Universal Online Payment Method?
0 Comment
05 Apr 2014 Posted by Conrad Leonetti

Bitcoin proponents are often perceived with the association of the stereotypical radical libertarian. However, such a broad categorization is no longer an appropriate one when it comes to the backbone of the digital currency’s support system.

Being a corporate finance expert myself, the concept bitcoin has grasped my attention and has quickly become something of which I cannot quite let go. Thankfully, I have learned that I am not alone. When speaking of the libertarian culture that has cultivated bitcoin, I start off by analyzing the concepts of the well-known and self-proclaimed lifelong democrat and Silicon Valley VC Chris Dixon. Dixon, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz believes that bitcoin, not only can, but will become the predominant vehicle in making online transactions.

Why does this scenario seem so likely to so many? Well, as Dixon explains, there is without doubt, a need for a universal payment method when it comes to making online transactions. “One reason the web’s in danger is there’s no payment system for the web,” he says. “I go to a mobile app; I can hit a button and pay 50 cents. I go to the web, and good luck.” On top of that, the VC partner explains how bitcoin could kill off the likes of Google and Apple. “Among other things, Apple and Google take 30 percent, which makes it impossible for our companies to make money. More importantly, I think, it just stifles innovation.”

While making my way through this bitcoin journey in speaking with various protagonists of the digital currency, I quickly discovered the love for speculation in regards to not just the potential use of the technology, but the excitement surrounding bitcoin in regard to its investment opportunity. How high will bitcoin go? This is something I have been asked many times when explaining bitcoin to others. As any financial analyst will tell you, there is no telling – you have probably already heard the high figures along with the low. I personally have heard speculations as high $1 million, and as low as zero. However, I have decided to take the most realistic approach in regards to the matter.

Going back to VC partner Chris Dixon, undoubtedly an expert when it comes to bitcoin, not to mention a stakeholder I must disclaim — he believes that if the digital currency gains widespread adoption throughout the online marketplace that the price of a single bitcoin will go through the roof. Given the scenario, which I no longer find unlikely, Dixon may just prove his point. “I think it could be easily worth $100,000,” he said.

I find such a scenario more likely than ever, as many of you know, Overstock.com made headlines when the online merchant began accepting bitcoin as a form of payment. The other night, as I was watching the television, I saw an overstock ad, like many I had seen before — but this time, something was different. I noticed that at the end of the ad right next the the Overtstock logo read the word “bitcoin.” I must say, it was the first time I had ever seen the word on a prime-time ad spot and I quickly realized that bitcoin is only just getting started. The major retailer serves as precedent, a model so to speak, and what do you know, it works. Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne announced that bitcoin has not only attracted new customers, but that the digital currency has brought them away from the competition, even from the likes of Amazon.com

Aside from Overstock, bitcoin’s acceptance among big name companies is soaring, Stripe, Tigerdirect, Virgin Galactic, WordPress, Reddit, The Pirate Bay, Zynga, Etsy, even the Sacramento Kings, and most recently Square Market. I could literally go on and on — but you get the point.

Due to the scarcity of bitcoin, a deflationary digital currency, an increase in demand along with the most basic fundamental aspect behind a price increase — that being direct cash infusion, could raise the price dramatically. Dixon further explains the likeliness of his scenario by giving a direct comparison to another resource which shares a degree of resemblance of bitcoin in regards to scarcity. Dixon is referring to domain names, just an analogy, in which he explains the relative aspects. “Domain names are an analogy,” he said. “It would have been absurd to say in 1993 that domain names were worth $10 million each.”

While keeping in mind that Dixon does have an economic incentive when it comes to the adoption of bitcoin, the VC partner knows the market inside and out and the fact that he chooses to place such a big bet on the digital currency in my opinion, speaks volumes. Dixon, along with Andreessen-Horowitz partner, Marc Andreessen have made investments upwards of $25 million through both Coinbase and Ripple, a small alt-currency with a relatively large market cap.

Another relative comparison when it comes to bitcoin, aside from its scarcity, is another one that I have heard time and time again — the birth of the internet. Along with many others, Dixon draws on this comparison. “I can’t imagine what they were saying about Linux 15 years ago. Microsoft, I’m sure, had a million reasons why no serious person could use it. Now there will be a billion Android phones shipped with Linux. Every web server that matters in the world runs on Linux.” he said.

While many, including myself, are getting very excited about bitcoin, it is important to remember that this new technology fundamentally remains in its beta stage. Dixon himself admits that while there are still flaws with the digital currency that will likely be worked out in the long run, he does not possess all the answers when it comes to bitcoin, nor does anyone else for that matter.

As Dixon, and more recently myself, along with many of you, embrace this new frontier, like any new technology, there will always be critics, but as Dixon himself said, “I’m going to place my money on millions of smart developers figuring these things out rather than the critics,” The VC took it ones step further as over the last Christmas he gave his family members a very special gift — bitcoin. “I think this is going to be big,” he said to them “I don’t know, but if it is, I want you to have a little piece of it.”

cryptocrimson.com/2014/04/bitcoin-bec...
[verwijderd]
0
"De gulden is terug, nu als virtuele munt"

Werkelijk leuk nieuws, mag hopen dat het aanslaat, een beetje meer publiciteit zou geen kwaad kunnen.
De vraag naar serieuze, virtuele munten is groot, dus het vertrouwen in de huidige gangbare munten is laag en nog steeds dalende.

Bijprinten, verruiming, het onnatuurlijk bijsturen van inflatie/deflatie, gevaarlijke opkoopprogramas....allemaal punten die het vertrouwen verder aantasten....
DeZwarteRidder
0
quote:

paulta schreef op 6 april 2014 10:22:

"De gulden is terug, nu als virtuele munt"

Werkelijk leuk nieuws, mag hopen dat het aanslaat, een beetje meer publiciteit zou geen kwaad kunnen.
De vraag naar serieuze, virtuele munten is groot, dus het vertrouwen in de huidige gangbare munten is laag en nog steeds dalende.

Bijprinten, verruiming, het onnatuurlijk bijsturen van inflatie/deflatie, gevaarlijke opkoopprogramas....allemaal punten die het vertrouwen verder aantasten....
ALLE altcoins (behalve misschien de Ripple en Litecoin) zijn veel te klein om veilig te kunnen zijn.

De BTC is zeer veilig door de enorme computerpower (hashrate) die hier achter staat.
Om deze reden is de Auroracoin van IJsland grandioos mislukt.
DeZwarteRidder
0
themisescircle.org/blog/2014/03/14/th...

Conclusion

Altcoins are not viable because they cannot reproduce that which gives Bitcoin an overwhelming competitive edge: its market cap. It is unethical to create an altcoin with the purpose of making money off of it for this reason. They should not be taken seriously. The way to defeat them is to keep demanding of the altcoin promoters that they spell out why their altcoin makes sense as an investment. The more that this demand is made, the worse altcoins will look.

This point needs to be made in a variety of ways, again and again. This article and the few others that have been written are not enough. It needs to be restated in as many different ways as possible until the altcoin movement is over.

Disclosure: the author owns bitcoins but has never owned altcoins, due to the fact that they are unsustainable. If he thought altcoins were sustainable, he would buy them rather than explain very carefully why they are unsustainable. He did try to mine dogecoin for a few hours once, but was not wowed.
DeZwarteRidder
0
Nederlander wordt nieuwe Bitcoin-goeroe

Gepubliceerd: 08 april 2014 19:22 | Laatste update: 09 april 2014 12:33
Een Nederlander komt aan het hoofd te staan van het team dat de kernsoftware van bitcoin ontwikkelt. Het gaat om de 32-jarige Wladimir van der Laan uit Eindhoven, schrijft Webwereld. Dit is zijn blog. Van der Laan studeerde wiskunde aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen en werkte als ontwikkelaar voor chipmachinemaker ASML. Hij volgt Gavin Andresen op als 'lead developer' en wordt verantwoordelijk voor het beheren en ontwikkelen van de bitcoin-software, Bitcoin Core.

Andresen was op zijn beurt de opvolger van de enigmatische bedenker van Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. Andresen verlaat het bitcoin-ship niet helemaal: hij blijft hoofdwetenschapper van de Bitcoin Foundation. Die stichting moet de standaardisatie van de virtuele munteenheid bevorderen. Software-update Van der Laans team is bezig met het repareren van de tekortkomingen van bitcoin die aan het licht kwamen door de ondergang van bitcoinbeurs MtGox. Een software-update moet manipulatie van transacties, waardoor MtGox het loodje legde, onmogelijk maken. De reputatie van de virtuele munt ligt al een tijdje onder vuur wegens omvallende bitcoin-bedrijven, maar onlangs trok zo'n bedrijf nog twee topmanagers uit de technologiebranche aan om het management te versterken.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Een Nederlander komt aan het hoofd te staan van het team dat de kernsoftware van bitcoin ontwikkelt.

Het gaat om de 32-jarige Wladimir van der Laan uit Eindhoven, schrijft Webwereld. Dit is zijn blog. Van der Laan studeerde wiskunde aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen en werkte als ontwikkelaar voor chipmachinemaker ASML.

Hij volgt Gavin Andresen op als ‘lead developer’ en wordt verantwoordelijk voor het beheren en ontwikkelen van de bitcoin-software, Bitcoin Core.

Andresen was op zijn beurt de opvolger van de enigmatische bedenker van Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. Andresen verlaat het bitcoin-ship niet helemaal: hij blijft hoofdwetenschapper van de Bitcoin Foundation. Die stichting moet de standaardisatie van de virtuele munteenheid bevorderen.

Software-update

Van der Laans team is bezig met het repareren van de tekortkomingen van bitcoin die aan het licht kwamen door de ondergang van bitcoinbeurs MtGox. Een software-update moet manipulatie van transacties, waardoor MtGox het loodje legde, onmogelijk maken.

De reputatie van de virtuele munt ligt al een tijdje onder vuur wegens omvallende bitcoin-bedrijven, maar onlangs trok zo’n bedrijf nog twee topmanagers uit de technologiebranche aan om het management te versterken.

www.z24.nl/geld/nederlander-wordt-nie...
15.675 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 780 781 782 783 784 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 13 mei 2024 13:20
Koers 62.548,00
Verschil +1.908,40 (+3,15%)
Hoog 63.262,04
Laag 60.833,09
Volume 0
Volume gemiddeld 0
Volume gisteren 0

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront