TomTom « Terug naar discussie overzicht

TomTom augustus 2015

4.953 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 244 245 246 247 248 » | Laatste
san marco
0
1. Stay complacent with your revenue streams

For companies that choose this path, digital disruption has directly or indirectly impacted their core business. Unfortunately, they realized this reality too late and are now racing to get back to the top spot. My assessment is that they require the utmost discipline in their organization to succeed, which may be unlikely given they’ve missed the boat already!

Take, for example, the car-rental industry. On a recent business trip, I wanted to return a car early since I would be stuck in all-day meetings at a hotel. Luckily (or so I thought), there was a rental location close by. After a 30-minute chat on the phone, I learned that the rental company wanted to charge me 300% more to return the car three days early at a hotel location only a few miles from the airport. This reminded me how antiquated and asset-centric (versus customer-centric) most car-rental business models are. Just imagine the possibilities if they could innovate!

When you consider that utilization rates of car fleets average between 75% and 80% for most established rental companies, there’s a clear opportunity to monetize that remaining 20% to 25% of excess capacity by offering vehicles to aspiring Uber and Lyft drivers. Although Hertz (a centenarian corporation) has been considering this for the past year, no one from the old guard in this industry has taken advantage of this opportunity – yet. As a result, a whole new flock of rental-car companies specializing in renting vehicles to Uber drivers has emerged, such as HyreCar and Breeze.

2. Embrace disruption and get innovating

Companies that embrace disruption have also experienced significant disruption to their core business. However, there is one difference: they are also using it as an opportunity to enter entirely new markets. The gloves are off, and innovation is percolating.

Let’s consider Sears. At nearly 130 years old, the company could be thought of as the “Amazon” of its day, originally selling watches to outpost communities in the late 1800s and eventually innovating to become a leader in retail catalog sales. For the time following World War II, the company could be considered a Big Data pioneer. By analyzing U.S. Census data and demographic shifts to the suburbs, Sears decided to invest in numerous mall locations to form a brick-and-mortar retail business.

Fast-forward to today, Sears has clearly been disrupted for a portion of its core retail business by Amazon. As a consequence, the company is now pivoting into an entirely new business: unlocking the value of its vast real estate acquired at dirt-cheap prices in the 1950s to essentially operate as a real-estate investment trust (REIT) across approximately 30% of “super-ZIP” (also known as high net-worth) malls in the United States. Some estimates claim that Sears owns more than 200 million square feet of space – double that of Simon Property Group Inc., the largest mall operator in the United States.

Sears recently spun off a portion of its real-estate holdings, comprising nearly 18% of its square footage, for $2.6 billion under a new publicly traded company, Seritage Growth Properties. By reconfiguring its spaces to house a variety of retailers such as Primark, Whole Foods, Nordstrom’s Rack, and Dick’s Sporting Goods, the company will gain annual revenue from rent that is higher than what a larger Sears store could generate in a few years.

However, it is not just retailers that are renting or buying those “big-box” stores. Some locations are being transformed into large data centers that facilitate the buying and selling of just about everything online. CyrusOne is one such innovator that specializes in this activity with data-center sites in suburbs, former office parks, and retail centers. It’s amazing to see online retailers displacing their large, brick-and-mortar competitors by using the real estate of those big-box stores to create data centers and sell goods online. Things really do come full circle!
san marco
1
3. Preempt disruption before it controls the business

Preemptive disruption is the ultimate goal for the old guard, but very few are members of this club. These companies do not fear new models that may sacrifice a portion of their stable business in exchange for new revenue streams of tomorrow.

A great example of a company that is investing money and talent to lead the innovation pack is The Home Depot. The company decided to take a provocative step three years ago by acquiring the technology startup BlackLocus. By infusing a creative “lab” culture within the enterprise, The Home Depot is laser-focused on optimizing its pricing through a data-driven model. Since the acquisition, BlackLocus has helped The Home Depot bridge the pricing gap between traditional business and a broad spectrum of online competitors.

Beyond this apparent benefit, The Home Depot understands that customer interaction is one of its fundamental values. To dedicate 60% of its associates’ time toward customer engagement, the company applied various mobile solutions to check inventory and pricing and support mobile payment on the store floor.

The last word

What separates the laggards from the leaders in the digital age? It’s the wherewithal to take calculated risks and a strong culture of innovation. Without these attributes, a corporation is likely to encounter a disruptive reckoning in the near future.

To support this transformation, companies must have a supporting technology platform. In my opinion, this is the essence of the Run Simple approach.

More important, businesses need to understand that digital disruption is not a choice – it is now an integral part of doing business. Companies must be data driven to out-innovate their respective industries. Doing so gives decision makers greater understanding of when, where, and how to transform; any relevant workforce implications; and impacts on the capital structure and infrastructure. Plus, it offers an opportunity to seamlessly unite all point of contacts between the customer and business with processes that adapt to demand.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

xynix schreef op 5 augustus 2015 16:28:

[...]
Ik denk dat het voor de IAA allang is gebeurd!

En dan is het inderdaad een herhaling van het vorige verkooprondje van de kaartbedrijven. Dan heeft TomTom trouwens wel heel wat beter op zijn talenten gepast dan Nokia! (voor de bijbelvasten onder ons)
Vraagje. Ik heb Juni 2017 opties Call € 15.-, daar heb ik gemiddeld € 1,40 voor betaald.

Stel; er komt een bod van € 15.- in september dit jaar ben ik dan mijn betaalde premie van € 1,40 kwijt? Dus maak ik verlies? Ik dacht juist slim te zijn door langlopende opties te nemen maar met alle ontwikkelingen de laatste tijd weet ik niet meer wat wijsheid is. Dan kan ik ze beter verkopen (met verlies) en dan in december opties stoppen of zo.
san marco
0

‘Big Brother’ Creator De Mol Posts Stake in Maps Provider TomTom

Bloomberg
August 5, 2015 — 9:58 AM CEST
Updated on August 5, 2015 — 10:36 AM CEST
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Billionaire John de Mol. Photographer: Remko de Waal/AFP via Getty Images
Billionaire John de Mol. Photographer: Remko de Waal/AFP via Getty Images
Don't Miss Out — Follow Bloomberg On

Billionaire John de Mol reported a 5.1 percent stake in TomTom NV amid reports that the Dutch navigation software and device maker is weighing options that could lead to a sale.

De Mol held 11.67 million ordinary shares of TomTom as of Aug. 4, according to a filing at Dutch regulator AFM on Wednesday, which didn’t disclose the price of sale. The television producer, known for creating one of the first modern-day reality-TV shows with “Big Brother,” agreed to sell his TV-format maker Talpa for $1.2 billion in March.

De Mol’s spokeswoman confirmed the filing. Shares of TomTom rose 3.5 percent to 10.39 euros at 10:18 a.m. in Amsterdam trading, bringing the gain this year to about 88 percent. At Tuesday’s closing price of 10.03 euros per share, De Mol’s stake would have been worth about 117 million euros ($127 million).

TomTom is exploring options that could lead to a sale as mapping technology draws growing interest from potential buyers, people familiar with the matter said earlier this week. There is no formal process under way and TomTom may decide against pursuing a sale and instead focus on investments, the people said.

Mapping companies are garnering more interest amid carmakers’ push for self-driving systems independent of technology giants such as Google Inc. German carmakers BMW AG, Audi AG and Daimler AG Monday announced an agreement to buy Nokia Oyj’s map business for 2.8 billion euros. TomTom was worth 2.3 billion euros at the close of trading in Amsterdam Tuesday.
[verwijderd]
0
[Modbreak IEX: Gelieve niet voortdurend dezelfde inhoudsloze berichten op het forum te plaatsen, bericht is verwijderd.]
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

Leeuw 007 schreef op 5 augustus 2015 16:49:

[...]
Zien jullie dat voorspellen niet zo moeilijk is.
Leeuw, je bent een half uur vertraagd denk ik...we stijgen nl weer....:)
ovanspaend
0
Koersreactie valt tegen. John de Mol is leuk. Beter was het als een groot bedrijf zoals UBER of APPLE een belang had genomen.
[verwijderd]
0
TomTom zou zelf het spel nog kunnen beïnvloeden door aan te geven dat ze positie van TTT overwegen nu deze is uitgegroeid tot de Europese marktleider en aldus een "quantum leap forward" zou kunnen betekenen voor een sterke businesspartner, waarbij significante synergie voordelen te behalen zijn en een doorslaggevende technologische voorsprong kan worden opgebouwd (waar overigens Thomas Schmidt volgens mij allemaal veeeeeeel te traag mee is!).
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

brilkoker schreef op 5 augustus 2015 16:51:

op naar 7 euro
Hahaha, 17 euro bedoel je?
san marco
0
Van dezelfde schrijver op Bloomberg. 'Uber wanted this precious...'

Uber’s Battle for Nokia’s Maps Is Good News for TomTom

Elco Van Groningen, Bloomberg

May 20, 2015 1:30 am

TomTom NV, the Dutch maker of navigation software and devices, rose to its highest level in almost six years as the company extended a licensing agreement with Apple Inc. and a bidding war for Nokia Oyj’s map business intensified.

The shares gained as much as 11 percent to 9.16 euros in Amsterdam after Bloomberg reported that groups that include Uber Technologies Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. are bidding for the Nokia division, called HERE.

“The parties that will miss it will start looking at TomTom,” Hans Slob, an analyst for Rabobank Nederland, said by phone. “So you’ll get some takeover speculation.”

TomTom and Nokia are among few companies with digital-map assets, which are sought by companies ranging from social networks and e-commerce providers to car manufacturers.

The Dutch company today said it extended a global agreement with Apple for maps and related information. That is soothing investors amid speculation that any bid by Apple for HERE could result in the iPhone maker canceling its contract with TomTom, Slob said.
san marco
0
ovanspaend 5 aug 2015 om 16:55

Dat doet geen 1 overnemende partij want dan drijf je de koper de prijs al flink op....
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

brilkoker schreef op 5 augustus 2015 16:51:

op naar 7 euro
nee, tomtom, het bedrijf gaat splitsen, niet het aandeel. (nog niet in ieder geval)
[verwijderd]
1
quote:

Mr. President schreef op 5 augustus 2015 16:42:

[...]Vraagje. Ik heb Juni 2017 opties Call € 15.-, daar heb ik gemiddeld € 1,40 voor betaald.

Stel; er komt een bod van € 15.- in september dit jaar ben ik dan mijn betaalde premie van € 1,40 kwijt? Dus maak ik verlies? Ik dacht juist slim te zijn door langlopende opties te nemen maar met alle ontwikkelingen de laatste tijd weet ik niet meer wat wijsheid is. Dan kan ik ze beter verkopen (met verlies) en dan in december opties stoppen of zo.
Zelf heb ik erg veel calls, het meerendeel september, maar sinds vandaag rol ik de sep 7 en sep 7,50 door naar de december 8 en 9. Die juni '17 opties neem ik pas zodra we op de 12 staan, en dan koop ik wel ITM opties, in die van jou zit 6 euro die wegloopt zodra we gaan stijgen, in principe sta je pas bij 16,41 op winst..............
[verwijderd]
0
bezinteergebelegt
0
Nou, zie dat bod vandaag zeker niet verschijnen dus morgen maar weer eens afwachten want als het op aankopen aankomt ben ik erg gierig en wil zo goedkoop mogelijk inkopen. Okke 10,50 call kost nog een eurootje met een spread van een duppie, ga ik niet doen en valt de tommie JP nabeurs toch dan alvast veel feli voor ieder1 maar ik geloof er nog niet in.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

mevr. Riet van Milt schreef op 5 augustus 2015 17:01:

[...]

Zelf heb ik erg veel calls, het meerendeel september, maar sinds vandaag rol ik de sep 7 en sep 7,50 door naar de december 8 en 9. Die juni '17 opties neem ik pas zodra we op de 12 staan, en dan koop ik wel ITM opties, in die van jou zit 6 euro die wegloopt zodra we gaan stijgen, in principe sta je pas bij 16,41 op winst..............
Dank voor je reactie en daar heb je natuurlijk gelijk in dat ik pas bij € 16,40 winst heb. Maar over 2 jaar verwacht ik dat TT veel hoger staat dan € 16,40 en dan kan ik nu meer opties kopen dan als ik ITM Juni 2017 zou kopen.

Het is me alleen nog niet duidelijk of ik bij een bod van € 15.- dit jaar ook mijn betaalde premie kwijt ben dus eigenlijk verlies heb. Weet je hier misschien iets meer over?
4.953 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 244 245 246 247 248 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 31 mei 2024 17:35
Koers 5,695
Verschil 0,000 (0,00%)
Hoog 5,735
Laag 5,605
Volume 246.504
Volume gemiddeld 280.587
Volume gisteren 206.184

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront