EU Manufacturing Sector Yet to See the Worst - EUROFER
European Steel Association EUROFER, after apparent steel consumption in EU fell by 2.5% YoY in the first quarter of 2019, announced that the negative trend in steel demand is the result of the ongoing slump in EU’s manufacturing sector due to weakened exports and investment and that forward looking indicators signal, at best, a low level stabilization later this year, but no rebound. It said “The manufacturing sector in the EU may have not seen the worst yet: a deepening escalation of the trade war between the US and several of its main trading partners and a no-deal Brexit would severely impact global trade conditions, trigger a further deterioration in business sentiment and lower investment growth. In that scenario, the EU steel sector would suffer badly because at the same time the risk of import distortions increases due to the expansion of the size of the safeguard measures’ quota both this year and next.”
Mr Axel Eggert DG of EUROFER said “Given these economic and market conditions the European Commission needs to act now to adapt the steel safeguard measures to reflect these circumstances. The repeated rises in the size of the quota this year and next are completely out of step with the sluggish steel market”.
EU28 apparent steel consumption fell by 2.5% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2019 and amounted to 42.6 million tonnes. Stock building in the distribution chain was lower than in the same quarter of 2018, which exacerbated the negative trend in final steel use. This should be seen in context of the development of the inventory cycle in the second half of last year which was characterized by lower than usual seasonal inventory reductions and therefore relatively high stock levels in the EU steel distribution chain at the start of 2019
The negative trend in steel demand at the start of this year has primarily hurt domestic steel producers in the EU. In the first quarter of 2019 domestic deliveries from EU mills to the EU market fell by 4% compared with the same period of 2018. Meanwhile, third country imports decreased only by 1% year-on-year and amounted to 10 million tonnes, accounting for 23.6% of EU steel demand.
The overall trend in total imports hides distortive developments in imports at the individual product level which are allowed under the current quota modalities and management. This situation has created, for several products, a rush for quota consumption including stock building and import concentration, disrupting the stagnating EU steel market, notably by Turkey and China. The most affected products are metallic coated sheets for automotive applications, rebar and wire rod.
The EU steel market is facing severe challenges which are expected to have a negative impact on apparent steel consumption. Following a decline in the first quarter of 2019, real steel consumption is, on balance, expected to stabilise around the year earlier level in the remainder of the year, leading to a total reduction in final steel use by 0.4% over the whole year. Meanwhile, flaws in the design and functioning of the current safeguard measures do not reflect the reality of an EU steel market. The market is being squeezed between negative final steel use developments and is facing the ongoing and serious threat of import deflection triggered by the US Section 232 import tariff in a context of persistent global overcapacity. The system still allows for extreme behaviours by exporters which have the potential to lead to serious market distortions. The expected reduction of apparent steel consumption in 2019 of 0.6% year-on-year is therefore expected to come mainly at the expense of EU steel producers.
Even though market conditions in 2020 are expected to improve moderately, risks related to import distortions continue to threaten the stability of the EU steel market. The 5% increase in the safeguard quota from July 2020 – following a 5% rise in February and in July 2019 – is once more not aligned with expected growth in real steel consumption of just 1.1% in 2020. The EU market therefore remains at risk of being destabilised by third country imports at the expense of EU domestic producers. Nevertheless, the mild increase in final steel use is expected to lead to apparent consumption growing by 1.4% in 2020.
From the peak in the final quarter of 2017, deteriorating business conditions in the manufacturing industry in general and in the automotive industry in particular led to an ongoing moderation in output growth in the steel-using sectors. The downturn in industrial activity is a global phenomenon, reflecting weakening global trade and investment. A fast rebound is not on the cards, also because of the negative impact of US protectionist measures on trade.
For the EU, risks related to the external environment will remain the key challenge over the forecast period 2019-2020. Over the past two years, the fundamentals of global trade have clearly changed for the worse, due to the US government putting tariffs on billions of dollars' worth of goods imported from its main trading partners the EU, Canada, Mexico and China. The affected countries have responded in kind, retaliating with similar tariffs on US products.
EU’s manufacturing base is suffering, particularly in those countries and sectors more exposed than average to international trade. Weakened business sentiment puts investment are at risk of falling behind expectations; this would be exacerbated in case of a no-deal Brexit and a further escalation in protectionist trade measures. Automotive tariffs imposed by the US authorities on automotive imports from the EU would seriously harm the entire automotive supply chain. On the positive side, a orderly Brexit and the settlement of trade disputes between the US and its main trading partners would pose an upside risk. Support is also provided by continued strength in construction.
Output in the EU’s steel-using sectors is forecast to grow by 1.1% in 2019 and by 1.4% in 2020.
EUROFER’s third quarter 2019 forecast for EU GDP growth is 1.4% in 2019 and 1.5% in 2020.
Source : Strategic Research Institute