Galapagos « Terug naar discussie overzicht

Galapagos augustus 2016

1.432 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 68 69 70 71 72 » | Laatste
gerrit 69
0

Het aandeel Galapagos is op 4 augustus mooi opgeveerd vanaf de steun op € 47,00
Nu een aanval op de weerstand van € 53,00 doen en dan hoor ik iedereen hier juichen.
www.adnbeursanalyse.nl/Aandelen/GLPG-...
de tuinman
0
egeltjemetstekel
0
quote:

de tuinman schreef op 5 augustus 2016 22:10:

Ze kunnen fase 3 voor RA en Crohn onderhand wel tegelijk gaan aankondigen.

tsja dat zou wat zijn.
[verwijderd]
3
I don't know if this has already been posted

www.nasdaq.com/article/market-has-not...

As always with Zacks reports one has to be cautious. However it is nice to read a positive write-up
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

SJURVM schreef op 5 augustus 2016 22:49:

I don't know if this has already been posted

www.nasdaq.com/article/market-has-not...

As always with Zacks reports one has to be cautious. However it is nice to read a positive write-up
Nice news so Zacks is a buy again?
[verwijderd]
1
quote:

SJURVM schreef op 5 augustus 2016 22:49:

I don't know if this has already been posted

www.nasdaq.com/article/market-has-not...

As always with Zacks reports one has to be cautious. However it is nice to read a positive write-up
Thanxs for sharing SJURVM.

However, for argument sake, the content .... Estimated eps go up and stock price down => big opportunity. It looks like an auto-generated report.
No mention of the bad side namely one or more drugs failing and no mention of the good side 1 billion in cash, another 2 billion milestones up the road and some nice royalties along the way.

The standard window for a price target is 1 year right ?
Jeffries 18-8-2015:
Galapagos (GLPG NA)
AbbVie Opt-in & CF Updates to Drive
Momentum; Boosting PT to €73
Although we got an Abbvie opt-out and Gilead opt-in risks have diminished since last year. So, another 2 weeks to get to €73, right ?

Apart from the start of the phase 3, we get to the AEX circus again soon. In 3 weeks there will be a decision whether CoCaCola EP has enough free float and free float velocity (that one is going to be interesting, 25% not counting first 20 days of listing and extrapolated to a year) to get into the AEX. Since there choice to come to Amsterdam was partially based on the AEX listing i would suppose they fullfill the requirements. Therefore we have to overtake SBM in the rankling not to drop out. (btw info can be found in the aex family rules on eurnext). Given the work that has been put into getting into the AEX (even a Harry appearance), i would suspect a bit of a news flow to secure place 24.

Regarding risk diminishing, we get some filtered info on the amount of patients in Darwin 3.I looked at some of the investor decks i have stored and found:
Jan: 900 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
April: 900 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
May: 900 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
June: >1,100 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
July: >1,100 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies

Just some thoughts.
[verwijderd]
0
quote:

winx08 schreef op 6 augustus 2016 09:42:

[...]

Thanxs for sharing SJURVM.

However, for argument sake, the content .... Estimated eps go up and stock price down => big opportunity. It looks like an auto-generated report.
No mention of the bad side namely one or more drugs failing and no mention of the good side 1 billion in cash, another 2 billion milestones up the road and some nice royalties along the way.

The standard window for a price target is 1 year right ?
Jeffries 18-8-2015:
Galapagos (GLPG NA)
AbbVie Opt-in & CF Updates to Drive
Momentum; Boosting PT to €73
Although we got an Abbvie opt-out and Gilead opt-in risks have diminished since last year. So, another 2 weeks to get to €73, right ?

Apart from the start of the phase 3, we get to the AEX circus again soon. In 3 weeks there will be a decision whether CoCaCola EP has enough free float and free float velocity (that one is going to be interesting, 25% not counting first 20 days of listing and extrapolated to a year) to get into the AEX. Since there choice to come to Amsterdam was partially based on the AEX listing i would suppose they fullfill the requirements. Therefore we have to overtake SBM in the rankling not to drop out. (btw info can be found in the aex family rules on eurnext). Given the work that has been put into getting into the AEX (even a Harry appearance), i would suspect a bit of a news flow to secure place 24.

Regarding risk diminishing, we get some filtered info on the amount of patients in Darwin 3.I looked at some of the investor decks i have stored and found:
Jan: 900 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
April: 900 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
May: 900 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
June: >1,100 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies
July: >1,100 years patient experience in large Ph2 studies

Just some thoughts.

As regards the AEX it would be rather strange to take GLPG out after just having allowed it in.

My take on this will be that of the 2 it is SBM who will be pushed out.

Possibly as a result of the Petrobras scandal. Brasil is under the spotlight with the Olympics. Corruption wilst people live in slums in Rio does not shed a very good light on politicians. The business community which uses dubious practices should perhaps not be in the top tier listings of their country.

Still we shall see.

As regards the zacks report one must not forget that they changed their hold rating to a buy one in early July so having a positive article does not come amiss.
Maybe I am a little cynical here :)

[verwijderd]
0
quote:

SJURVM schreef op 6 augustus 2016 15:10:

[...]

As regards the AEX it would be rather strange to take GLPG out after just having allowed it in.

My take on this will be that of the 2 it is SBM who will be pushed out.

...

...
Maybe I am a little cynical here :)

see 5.2.5, nr 25 is out if CCCEP is in.

I like cynics. used to be member of the positive cynists (have a very lengthy cynical argument and close with a minor positive thing :-)
Bijlage:
[verwijderd]
0
Well they are very wise people at the selection committee.
I would still say that SBM will be out.
That would reduce the Oil & Gas weighting in the index. Considering that sector performance you could see why they would do that.
They increase food & beverage,which in times of "slowing" growth or no growth at all still performs well.
And they keep the health care sector in the index.

You obtain therewith a nice broad, better adjusted, index.

that's my view on it.

for what it's worth of course :)

[verwijderd]
0
quote:

SJURVM schreef op 6 augustus 2016 17:40:

Well they are very wise people at the selection committee.
....
that's my view on it.

for what it's worth of course :)

I am always interested in your view. In this case i am afraid it is all about mathematics and nothing about wise people making decissions.

Let the PR machine start to roll and go for the 24th place.

cheers.

p.s. i am sure there was a plan to get into the AEX so there must also be a plan to stay in.
twopence
0
MtBaker
0
Standaard is down meestal met laag volume en dan na een tijdje weer sterk herstel bij groot volume. Met andere woorden proberen de kleine particulieren uit te schudden. Vergelijk met schommeling short posities, maar dat is achteraf.
Nu ook geen real time meer voor particulieren, kun je beter schudden.
tonneke
0
Goedemorgen, ik had al verteld gala moe te zijn, ik vind het wel zo jammer iedere keer iets omhoog en dan, hup als een speer achteruit, en hoe lang roept men al: komt goed, zal heus wel.
Nice guy
0
Of zoals de grote Warren Buffett ooit zei: "The stock market is a device that transfers money from the impatient to the patient"
whoiam
0
tonneke, je kan zo elke dag zagen, voor hetzelfde geld eindigen we nog groen vandaag, leg ze gewoon eens op de plank voor 3 jaar en je zal wel tevreden zijn dan
_Giulietta_
0
quote:

asti schreef op 4 augustus 2016 23:02:

[...]
Er zitten echt een paar steekjes los bij deze gast lol

Guilietta wat zouden jongeren ervan denken als ze chicken zijn zoveelste maffe uitbarsting lezen op dit beleggersforum?
We kijken alleen de andere kant uit hè, we maken ons zorgen om de verlegen jongeren -en al dan niet welwillende danspartners, maar absoluut niet om de serieuze posters, integendeel.
de rotterdammer
0
quote:

tonneke schreef op 8 augustus 2016 09:30:

Goedemorgen, ik had al verteld gala moe te zijn, ik vind het wel zo jammer iedere keer iets omhoog en dan, hup als een speer achteruit, en hoe lang roept men al: komt goed, zal heus wel.
Bekijk het op langere termijn. Berichten over Galapagos zijn zelden negatief en er zit veel potentieel in het fonds. Komt vanzelf goed. Sectoren die nu aantrekken (financiën, grondstoffen) hebben nu even de voorkeur van beleggers.
1.432 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 68 69 70 71 72 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met uw e-mailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Detail

Vertraagd 20 mei 2024 17:37
Koers 26,980
Verschil -0,520 (-1,89%)
Hoog 27,500
Laag 26,840
Volume 102.716
Volume gemiddeld 91.724
Volume gisteren 194.854

EU stocks, real time, by Cboe Europe Ltd.; Other, Euronext & US stocks by NYSE & Cboe BZX Exchange, 15 min. delayed
#/^ Index indications calculated real time, zie disclaimer, streaming powered by: Infront